...where we left off
So, three and a half years have passed, during which time the author has avoided total stupefaction, but the blog's subject has progressed in bounds, hops and leaps, not to mention the occasional sprint.
Indeed there is now another reason to resume these posts, or rather another being: #2 has joined number one. However, as #2 arrived in 2008, any authorial claim to this being the main inspiration is a little stretched.
In 2006 I was subsumed by the world of nappies, nocturnal bottles and sleep torture. This inferno survived, I find today's paternal duties are more satisfying, involving as they do the production of answers to a sequence of intuitive questions, and the odd highly polished reasoned remark.
The subject of this evening's line of questioning was death. I knew this one was, well, like death, inevitable. I hadn't expected it to emerge from a discussion of the solar system, but then perhaps I am underestimating #1's imagination, or overrating my own powers of foresight. Both are perhaps true.
Now, the death question can elicit a range of answers, largely because it's the one we try at most. There is no clear route to an answer, rather a few hand-holds up a rather steep and forbidding mountain. My preferred answer - that death is simply the mechanism by which we return to non-existence - is perhaps too much for a small brain to process. But ducking the question is not morally sound, and I'd hope #1 would protest later in life if she thought daddy hopped out of the ring at the first sign of a fight.
The problem which arises is that children, unavoidably self-centred as they are, don't so much conceptualise death as personalise it. The question is not "What is death?" but "Why will I die?".
Worse, it ceases to be a question and becomes a statement: "But I don't want to die!" (The exclamation mark is not for effect. This is how it is said.) And this becomes the stuff of bad dreams, with the sub-conscious doing its best to terrify the mind into giving some answers.
The introduction to death in this way is, of course, merely the start of the journey - it is the first few steps all over again, and the parent watches the toddling with some apprehension. Where it goes from here is all to obvious. Why do I have to die? What happens to me when I die? We know, thanks to science, the answers to these questions. But to jump straight to these responses would miss the point that the question is philosophical in its intention. This is not to say that one should withhold the science. Rather, I reckon I should be prepared to work to those answers with some care, and in no particular hurry. Certainty may be absurd, but the doubt part requires tender mercies, at least at first.
